webmcp.ora.ai WebMCP audit

Name: webmcp.ora.ai WebMCP audit
Creator: ora

Rescan

audited Sep 1, 2026in 11s

98/ 100100% of the applicable check weight evaluated

3 tools registered. Strongest in shared experience, weakest in tool quality.

Shared experience100

Task completion100

Tool quality93

Trust100

https://webmcp.ora.ai

Tools

2 read, 0 write, 1 undeclared

Loading map

scan_domain

Run an Ora agent-readiness scan for a domain or MCP server URL. Returns the 0-100 score, grade, and per-layer breakdown; a recent stored result is served from cache instead of rescanning.No behaviour hints declared. Agents should treat it as possibly state-changing.

pagehttps://webmcp.ora.ai/

implementation

viaimperative

entry pointdocument

registered after229ms

executepresent

api surface

urlrequired

annotations

read onlynot declared

untrusted contentnot declared

titlenot declared

1 finding

warningNaming quality

weight 2

Tool naming makes selection harder than it needs to be: 1 name does not start with a verb (scan_domain).

fix

{ name: "scan_domain" /* short, unique, verb-based */ }

tool json

{
  "name": "scan_domain",
  "description": "Run an Ora agent-readiness scan for a domain or MCP server URL. Returns the 0-100 score, grade, and per-layer breakdown; a recent stored result is served from cache instead of rescanning.",
  "inputSchema": {
    "type": "object",
    "properties": {
      "url": {
        "type": "string",
        "description": "Domain or URL to scan, e.g. stripe.com"
      }
    },
    "required": [
      "url"
    ],
    "additionalProperties": false
  },
  "annotations": {}
}

Findings

Shared experience

100 / 100 · weight 30

passPage experience

weight 20

The page a person sees holds up next to the agent surface: a working interface, visible actions, readable content, nothing in the way.

passHuman parity

weight 10

The person co-browsing can see and use this page - the same page the agent's tools act on.

Task completion

100 / 100 · weight 25

passTool selection

weight 15

An agent chose an existing, callable tool and built a schema-valid call for all 2 canonical intents, each matching the kind of tool its intent needs. Nothing was executed, so this verifies selection, not outcomes.

not applicableCoverage vs. site type

weight 10

This tool set does not place the site in a category with a known expected tool shape, so there is no coverage baseline to score it against.

Tool quality

93 / 100 · weight 25

passRegistration timing

weight 1

Every measured tool registered within 229ms of navigation.

toolget_leaderboard

passCanonical entry point

weight 3

All 3 tools register on the canonical document.modelContext entry point.

passSchema validity

weight 4

All 3 declared input schemas are structurally valid object schemas.

warningSchema quality

weight 4

1 of 3 tool schemas are harder for an agent to use than they need to be: get_leaderboard declares no required list, so an agent cannot tell which parameters are mandatory.

toolget_leaderboard

get_leaderboard: declares no required list, so an agent cannot tell which parameters are mandatory

fix

{
  name: "get_leaderboard",
  inputSchema: {
    type: "object",
    properties: {
      query: { type: "string", description: "What to search for" }
    },
    required: ["query"]
  }
}

warningNaming quality

weight 2

Tool naming makes selection harder than it needs to be: 1 name does not start with a verb (scan_domain).

toolscan_domain

fix

{ name: "scan_domain" /* short, unique, verb-based */ }

passStub detection

weight 4

All 3 tools declare an execute handler.

passRegistration errors

weight 2

No tool registration threw during the capture.

passDescription quality

weight 5

All 3 rated tool descriptions say what the tool does, when to use it, and what it returns.

Trust

100 / 100 · weight 20

passAnnotations present

weight 6

All 2 read-shaped tools declare readOnlyHint: true - the one declared claim that lets an agent treat a call as safe to make without asking.

passAnnotation mismatch

weight 6

No tool claims to be read-only while its own name or description says it writes (2 declared hints checked).

not applicableUntrusted content hint

weight 4

No tool's contract suggests it returns text written by somebody other than the site, so there is nothing to flag as untrusted.

not applicableInjection surface

weight 4

No tool's metadata carries instruction-shaped text aimed at the agent reading it. This check only ever flags; it never credits a site.

Tool selection

100% across 2 intents

I want to scan domain on this site.ok

chosescan_domainexpected scan domainkind matched

arguments

{
  "url": "example.com"
}

I want to get score on this site.ok

choseget_scoreexpected get scorekind matched

arguments

{
  "domain": "example.com"
}

model: gemini-2.5-flash

Add the tools this site is missing

Our scanner reads your website and suggests the right WebMCP tools for it.

The open source webmcp plugin teaches your coding agent to audit a site, implement tools on document.modelContext, and verify them in a real browser. npx @ora-ai/webmcp-verify runs the verification on its own. No signup, no hosted service.

how this was captured

observed via: capture shim (Chromium 148.0.7778.96)
chrome: 148.0.7778.96
capture shim: v1
spec snapshot: 2026-08-26
mode: fast
pages: 1 - entry page only
tools: 3
run time: 11s
finished: Sep 1, 2026

Checked the way in-browser agents discover tools: the top-level document's modelContext registry, read after the page settles.