vishwajeet.co WebMCP audit

Name: vishwajeet.co WebMCP audit
Creator: ora

Rescan

audited Sep 1, 2026in 11s

90/ 100100% of the applicable check weight evaluated

3 tools registered. Strongest in task completion, weakest in tool quality.

Shared experience88

Task completion100

Tool quality75

Trust100

https://vishwajeet.co

Tools

3 read, 0 write

Loading map

portfolio_get_profile

Get Vishwajeet Raj's professional profile, skills, tools, and public links.Answers a question. Declared read only.

pagehttps://vishwajeet.co/

implementation

viaimperative

entry pointdocument

registered after55ms

executepresent

api surfaceTakes no parameters.

annotations

read onlytrue

untrusted contentnot declared

titlenot declared

2 findings

warningNaming quality

weight 2

Tool naming makes selection harder than it needs to be: 3 names do not start with a verb (portfolio_get_profile).

fix

{ name: "portfolio_get_profile" /* short, unique, verb-based */ }

warningDescription quality

weight 5

3 of 3 tool descriptions leave an agent guessing: portfolio_get_profile Does not specify what comes back from the tool..

portfolio_get_profile: weak; portfolio_list_experience: weak; portfolio_list_projects: weak

fix

{
  name: "portfolio_get_profile",
  description: "Describe what this tool does, when to use it, and what it returns."
}

tool json

{
  "name": "portfolio_get_profile",
  "description": "Get Vishwajeet Raj's professional profile, skills, tools, and public links.",
  "inputSchema": null,
  "annotations": {
    "readOnlyHint": true
  }
}

Findings

Shared experience

88 / 100 · weight 30

passPage experience

weight 20

1 of 4 page-experience marks came back short: obstruction A floating navigation bar partially covers the 'Work Experience' section..

obstruction: weak

passHuman parity

weight 10

The person co-browsing can see and use this page - the same page the agent's tools act on.

Task completion

100 / 100 · weight 25

passTool selection

weight 15

An agent chose an existing, callable tool and built a schema-valid call for all 1 canonical intents, each matching the kind of tool its intent needs. Nothing was executed, so this verifies selection, not outcomes.

not applicableCoverage vs. site type

weight 10

This tool set does not place the site in a category with a known expected tool shape, so there is no coverage baseline to score it against.

Tool quality

75 / 100 · weight 25

passRegistration timing

weight 1

Every measured tool registered within 55ms of navigation.

toolportfolio_list_projects

passCanonical entry point

weight 3

All 3 tools register on the canonical document.modelContext entry point.

passSchema validity

weight 4

All 2 declared input schemas are structurally valid object schemas. The other 1 tool declares none, which is spec-legal for a zero-argument tool.

warningSchema quality

weight 4

2 of 3 tool schemas are harder for an agent to use than they need to be: portfolio_list_experience declares no required list, so an agent cannot tell which parameters are mandatory.

toolportfolio_list_experience

portfolio_list_experience: declares no required list, so an agent cannot tell which parameters are mandatory; portfolio_list_projects: declares no required list, so an agent cannot tell which paramete

fix

{
  name: "portfolio_list_experience",
  inputSchema: {
    type: "object",
    properties: {
      query: { type: "string", description: "What to search for" }
    },
    required: ["query"]
  }
}

warningNaming quality

weight 2

Tool naming makes selection harder than it needs to be: 3 names do not start with a verb (portfolio_get_profile).

toolportfolio_get_profile

fix

{ name: "portfolio_get_profile" /* short, unique, verb-based */ }

passStub detection

weight 4

All 3 tools declare an execute handler.

passRegistration errors

weight 2

No tool registration threw during the capture.

warningDescription quality

weight 5

3 of 3 tool descriptions leave an agent guessing: portfolio_get_profile Does not specify what comes back from the tool..

toolportfolio_get_profile

portfolio_get_profile: weak; portfolio_list_experience: weak; portfolio_list_projects: weak

fix

{
  name: "portfolio_get_profile",
  description: "Describe what this tool does, when to use it, and what it returns."
}

Trust

100 / 100 · weight 20

not applicableAnnotations present

weight 6

No tool name reads like a read, and an absent readOnlyHint already defaults to "this may write" - the one hint worth declaring here is readOnlyHint: true on read tools, and this set has none to declare it on.

passAnnotation mismatch

weight 6

No tool claims to be read-only while its own name or description says it writes (3 declared hints checked).

not applicableUntrusted content hint

weight 4

No tool's contract suggests it returns text written by somebody other than the site, so there is nothing to flag as untrusted.

not applicableInjection surface

weight 4

No tool's metadata carries instruction-shaped text aimed at the agent reading it. This check only ever flags; it never credits a site.

Tool selection

100% across 1 intents

I want to portfolio get profile on this site.ok

choseportfolio_get_profileexpected portfolio get profilekind matched

arguments

{}

model: gemini-2.5-flash

Add the tools this site is missing

Our scanner reads your website and suggests the right WebMCP tools for it.

The open source webmcp plugin teaches your coding agent to audit a site, implement tools on document.modelContext, and verify them in a real browser. npx @ora-ai/webmcp-verify runs the verification on its own. No signup, no hosted service.

how this was captured

observed via: capture shim (Chromium 148.0.7778.96)
chrome: 148.0.7778.96
capture shim: v1
spec snapshot: 2026-08-26
mode: fast
pages: 1 - entry page only
tools: 3
run time: 11s
finished: Sep 1, 2026

Checked the way in-browser agents discover tools: the top-level document's modelContext registry, read after the page settles.