audited Oct 29, 2026in 9s
80/ 100Incomplete audit · 50% of the applicable check weight evaluated

3 tools registered. Strongest in tool quality, weakest in shared experience. Tool selection was not measured.

Shared experience50
Tool selectionN/A
Tool quality100
Trust100
https://smartretry.com
Captured view of https://smartretry.com

Tools

3 read, 0 write
Loading map
lookup_decline_code: warning

lookup_decline_code

Look up a card payment decline (issuer response) code or message and get what it means, which provider and group it belongs to, and whether it is worth retrying.Answers a question. Declared read only.
pagehttps://www.smartretry.com/
implementation
viaimperative
entry pointdocument
registered after270ms
executepresent
api surface
queryrequired
annotations
read onlytrue
untrusted contentnot declared
titlenot declared
1 finding
warningHuman parity
weight 8
3 tools run through the JavaScript API and the page itself was not graded on this run, so parity could not be confirmed. A visible effect in your existing UI when a tool runs closes the gap.
lookup_decline_code, estimate_failed_payment_loss, get_pricing_model
fix
// Make the tool's effect visible on the page the person is looking at:
// update the same UI your existing human flow uses when lookup_decline_code runs,
// so the person co-browsing sees what the agent just did.
execute: async (args, { signal }) => {
  const result = await performAction(args, signal);
  renderResultInPage(result); // the human-visible half of the same action
  return result;
}
tool json
{
  "name": "lookup_decline_code",
  "description": "Look up a card payment decline (issuer response) code or message and get what it means, which provider and group it belongs to, and whether it is worth retrying.",
  "inputSchema": {
    "type": "object",
    "properties": {
      "query": {
        "type": "string",
        "description": "A decline code such as \"05\" or \"51\", or a message such as \"do not honor\"."
      }
    },
    "required": [
      "query"
    ]
  },
  "annotations": {
    "readOnlyHint": true
  }
}
Showing lookup_decline_code

Findings

Shared experience

50 / 100 · weight 30
not applicableVisible effect
weight 6
Not invoked on this run: this audit did not call any tool. Scheduled re-audits only read the registry; a live audit from the report page calls the tools that declare readOnlyHint: true and not consequentialHint: true.
not measuredPage experience
weight 16
The page-experience model hop returned no usable result, so the page was not graded.
warningHuman parity
weight 8
3 tools run through the JavaScript API and the page itself was not graded on this run, so parity could not be confirmed. A visible effect in your existing UI when a tool runs closes the gap.
toollookup_decline_code
lookup_decline_code, estimate_failed_payment_loss, get_pricing_model
fix
// Make the tool's effect visible on the page the person is looking at:
// update the same UI your existing human flow uses when lookup_decline_code runs,
// so the person co-browsing sees what the agent just did.
execute: async (args, { signal }) => {
  const result = await performAction(args, signal);
  renderResultInPage(result); // the human-visible half of the same action
  return result;
}

Tool selection

not measured
not applicableInvoke success rate
weight 6
Not invoked on this run: this audit did not call any tool. Scheduled re-audits only read the registry; a live audit from the report page calls the tools that declare readOnlyHint: true and not consequentialHint: true.
not measuredTool selection
weight 12
The tool-selection model hop returned no usable result.
not applicableCoverage vs. site type
weight 7
This tool set does not place the site in a category with a known expected tool shape, so there is no coverage baseline to score it against.

Tool quality

100 / 100 · weight 25
passRegistration timing
weight 1
Every measured tool registered within 271ms of navigation.
toolestimate_failed_payment_loss
passCanonical entry point
weight 3
All 3 tools register on the canonical document.modelContext entry point.
passSchema validity
weight 4
All 3 declared input schemas are structurally valid object schemas.
passSchema quality
weight 4
All 2 of 3 tool schemas that declare parameters describe them (the other 1 declares no parameters), and every description stays within Chrome's size guidance.
passNaming quality
weight 2
All 3 tool names are consistent, verb-led, and within Chrome's size guidance.
passStub detection
weight 4
All 3 tools declare an execute handler.
passRegistration errors
weight 2
No tool registration threw during the capture.
not measuredDescription quality
weight 5
The description-quality model hop returned no usable result, so descriptions were not rated.

Trust

100 / 100 · weight 20
passAnnotations present
weight 4
All 3 read-shaped tools declare readOnlyHint: true - the one declared claim that lets an agent treat a call as safe to make without asking.
passAnnotation mismatch
weight 4
No tool claims to be read-only while its own name or description says it writes (3 declared hints checked).
not applicableUntrusted content hint
weight 3
No tool's contract suggests it returns text written by somebody other than the site, so there is nothing to flag as untrusted.
not applicableConsequential hint
weight 3
No tool name reads like a consequential action (a purchase, a booking, a payment, a transfer, a deletion), so there is no consequentialHint to expect.
not applicableHint vs. observed
weight 3
Not invoked on this run: this audit did not call any tool. Scheduled re-audits only read the registry; a live audit from the report page calls the tools that declare readOnlyHint: true and not consequentialHint: true.
not measuredInjection surface
weight 3
The injection-surface model hop returned no usable result, so tool contracts were not reviewed for injection surface.

Tool selection

The tool-selection model hop returned no usable result.

Add the tools this site is missing

Our scanner reads your website and suggests the right WebMCP tools for it.
Reads the site's public pages; takes a few seconds.
The open source webmcp plugin teaches your coding agent to audit a site, implement tools on document.modelContext, and verify them in a real browser. npx @ora-ai/webmcp-verify runs the verification on its own. No signup, no hosted service.
how this was captured
observed via
capture shim (Chromium 151.0.7922.34)
chrome
151.0.7922.34
capture shim
v3
spec snapshot
2026-10-16
mode
fast
pages
1 - entry page only
tools
3
invoked
not invoked; a live audit calls them
run time
9s
finished
Oct 29, 2026
Checked the way in-browser agents discover tools: the top-level document's modelContext registry, read after the page settles.