shireautomations.com WebMCP audit

Name: shireautomations.com WebMCP audit
Creator: ora

Rescan

audited Nov 11, 2026in 10s

99/ 100100% of the applicable check weight evaluated

4 tools registered. Strongest in shared experience, weakest in tool quality.

Shared experience100

Tool selection100

Tool quality98

Trust100

https://shireautomations.com

Tools

1 read, 3 write

Loading map

start_workflow_intake

Open the Shire Automations intake form when a small or medium-sized business wants to describe a workflow, an AI-assisted step, a customer app, or a dashboard. Returns confirmation that the form is open. Does not submit the intake or any contact details.Takes an action on the site.

pagehttps://shireautomations.com/

implementation

viaimperative

entry pointdocument

registered after718ms

executepresent

api surfaceTakes no parameters.

annotations

read onlyfalse

untrusted contentnot declared

titlenot declared

consequentialfalse

0 findingsNo check named this tool.

tool json

{
  "name": "start_workflow_intake",
  "description": "Open the Shire Automations intake form when a small or medium-sized business wants to describe a workflow, an AI-assisted step, a customer app, or a dashboard. Returns confirmation that the form is open. Does not submit the intake or any contact details.",
  "inputSchema": {
    "type": "object",
    "properties": {}
  },
  "annotations": {
    "readOnlyHint": false,
    "consequentialHint": false
  }
}

Findings

Shared experience

100 / 100 · weight 30

not applicableVisible effect

weight 6

Not invoked on this run: this audit did not call any tool. Scheduled re-audits only read the registry; a live audit from the report page calls the tools that declare readOnlyHint: true and not consequentialHint: true.

passPage experience

weight 16

The page a person sees holds up next to the agent surface: a working interface, visible actions, readable content, nothing in the way.

passHuman parity

weight 8

The person co-browsing can see and use this page - the same page the agent's tools act on.

Tool selection

100 / 100 · weight 25

not applicableInvoke success rate

weight 6

passTool selection

weight 12

An agent chose an existing, callable tool and built a schema-valid call for all 3 canonical intents, each matching the kind of tool its intent needs. Nothing was executed, so this verifies selection, not outcomes.

not applicableCoverage vs. site type

weight 7

This tool set does not place the site in a category with a known expected tool shape, so there is no coverage baseline to score it against.

Tool quality

98 / 100 · weight 25

passRegistration timing

weight 1

Every measured tool registered within 718ms of navigation.

toolopen_booking

passCanonical entry point

weight 3

All 4 tools register on the canonical document.modelContext entry point.

passSchema validity

weight 4

All 4 declared input schemas are structurally valid object schemas.

passSchema quality

weight 4

All 1 of 4 tool schemas that declare parameters describe them (the other 3 declare no parameters), and every description stays within Chrome's size guidance.

warningNaming quality

weight 2

Tool naming makes selection harder than it needs to be: 2 names do not start with a verb (open_booking).

toolopen_booking

fix

{ name: "open_booking" /* short, unique, verb-based */ }

passStub detection

weight 4

All 4 tools declare an execute handler.

passRegistration errors

weight 2

No tool registration threw during the capture.

passDescription quality

weight 5

All 4 rated tool descriptions say what the tool does, when to use it, and what it returns.

Trust

100 / 100 · weight 20

passAnnotations present

weight 4

All 1 read-shaped tool declares readOnlyHint: true - the one declared claim that lets an agent treat a call as safe to make without asking.

passAnnotation mismatch

weight 4

No tool claims to be read-only while its own name or description says it writes (4 declared hints checked).

not applicableUntrusted content hint

weight 3

No tool's contract suggests it returns text written by somebody other than the site, so there is nothing to flag as untrusted.

not applicableConsequential hint

weight 3

No tool name reads like a consequential action (a purchase, a booking, a payment, a transfer, a deletion), so there is no consequentialHint to expect.

not applicableHint vs. observed

weight 3

not applicableInjection surface

weight 3

No tool's metadata carries instruction-shaped text aimed at the agent reading it. This check only ever flags; it never credits a site.

Tool selection

100% across 3 intents

I want to start workflow intake on this site.ok

chosestart_workflow_intakeexpected start workflow intakekind matched

arguments

{}

I want to show pricing on this site.ok

choseshow_pricingexpected show pricingkind matched

arguments

{}

I want to open booking on this site.ok

choseopen_bookingexpected open bookingkind matched

arguments

{}

model: gemini-2.5-flash

Add the tools this site is missing

Our scanner reads your website and suggests the right WebMCP tools for it.

The open source webmcp plugin teaches your coding agent to audit a site, implement tools on document.modelContext, and verify them in a real browser. npx @ora-ai/webmcp-verify runs the verification on its own. No signup, no hosted service.

how this was captured

observed via: capture shim (Chromium 151.0.7922.34)
chrome: 151.0.7922.34
capture shim: v3
spec snapshot: 2026-11-10
mode: fast
pages: 1 - entry page only
tools: 4
invoked: not invoked; a live audit calls them
run time: 10s
finished: Nov 11, 2026

Checked the way in-browser agents discover tools: the top-level document's modelContext registry, read after the page settles.