referralcodelink.com WebMCP audit

Name: referralcodelink.com WebMCP audit
Creator: ora

Rescan

audited Sep 1, 2026in 38s

68/ 100100% of the applicable check weight evaluated

2 tools registered. Strongest in shared experience, weakest in task completion. Trust was not measured.

Shared experience100

Task completion0

Tool quality96

TrustN/A

https://referralcodelink.com

Tools

0 read, 0 write, 2 undeclared

Loading map

scan_images_c2pa

Scan every <img> on the current page for C2PA Content Credentials (content provenance metadata) and return a per-image summary: whether a manifest is present, the claim generator (the tool that produced or edited the image), the title, and the signer name. Use this to find which images on a page carry provenance data. Note: provenance is decoded but NOT cryptographically verified.No behaviour hints declared. Agents should treat it as possibly state-changing.

pagehttps://referralcodelink.com/

implementation

viaimperative

entry pointdocument

registered after435ms

executepresent

api surface

limitoptional

annotations

read onlynot declared

untrusted contentnot declared

titlenot declared

1 finding

warningNaming quality

weight 2

Tool naming makes selection harder than it needs to be: 2 names do not start with a verb (scan_images_c2pa).

fix

{ name: "scan_images_c2pa" /* short, unique, verb-based */ }

tool json

{
  "name": "scan_images_c2pa",
  "description": "Scan every <img> on the current page for C2PA Content Credentials (content provenance metadata) and return a per-image summary: whether a manifest is present, the claim generator (the tool that produced or edited the image), the title, and the signer name. Use this to find which images on a page carry provenance data. Note: provenance is decoded but NOT cryptographically verified.",
  "inputSchema": {
    "type": "object",
    "properties": {
      "limit": {
        "type": "integer",
        "minimum": 1,
        "maximum": 100,
        "default": 25,
        "description": "Maximum number of images to fetch and scan (default 25, max 100)."
      }
    },
    "required": []
  },
  "annotations": {}
}

Findings

Shared experience

100 / 100 · weight 30

passPage experience

weight 20

The page a person sees holds up next to the agent surface: a working interface, visible actions, readable content, nothing in the way.

passHuman parity

weight 10

The person co-browsing can see and use this page - the same page the agent's tools act on.

Task completion

0 / 100 · weight 25

failTool selection

weight 15

An agent chose an existing tool and built a schema-valid call that held up on 0 of 3 canonical intents; on "Open the document I was working on most recently." no tool on the page served it. Nothing was executed, so this verifies selection, not outcomes.

failCoverage vs. site type

weight 10

The tool set covers 0 of the 3 things an agent needs on a editor site; it cannot open or read a document or edit or write content or save, publish, or share the result.

Tool quality

96 / 100 · weight 25

passRegistration timing

weight 1

Every measured tool registered within 435ms of navigation.

toolinspect_image_c2pa

passCanonical entry point

weight 3

All 2 tools register on the canonical document.modelContext entry point.

passSchema validity

weight 4

All 2 declared input schemas are structurally valid object schemas.

passSchema quality

weight 4

All 2 tool schemas describe their parameters, and every description stays within Chrome's size guidance.

warningNaming quality

weight 2

Tool naming makes selection harder than it needs to be: 2 names do not start with a verb (scan_images_c2pa).

toolscan_images_c2pa

fix

{ name: "scan_images_c2pa" /* short, unique, verb-based */ }

passStub detection

weight 4

All 2 tools declare an execute handler.

passRegistration errors

weight 2

No tool registration threw during the capture.

passDescription quality

weight 5

All 2 rated tool descriptions say what the tool does, when to use it, and what it returns.

Trust

not measured

not applicableAnnotations present

weight 6

No tool name reads like a read, and an absent readOnlyHint already defaults to "this may write" - the one hint worth declaring here is readOnlyHint: true on read tools, and this set has none to declare it on.

not applicableAnnotation mismatch

weight 6

No tool declares a readOnlyHint, so there is no safety claim to contradict.

not applicableUntrusted content hint

weight 4

No tool's contract suggests it returns text written by somebody other than the site, so there is nothing to flag as untrusted.

not applicableInjection surface

weight 4

No tool's metadata carries instruction-shaped text aimed at the agent reading it. This check only ever flags; it never credits a site.

Tool selection

0% across 3 intents

Open the document I was working on most recently.missed

choseno toolexpected document openkind not applicable

No tool was picked for this intent.

arguments

{}

Add a short summary paragraph at the top.missed

choseno toolexpected content editkind not applicable

No tool was picked for this intent.

arguments

{}

Save it and give me a link I can share.missed

choseno toolexpected save or sharekind not applicable

No tool was picked for this intent.

arguments

{}

model: gemini-2.5-flash

Add the tools this site is missing

Our scanner reads your website and suggests the right WebMCP tools for it.

The open source webmcp plugin teaches your coding agent to audit a site, implement tools on document.modelContext, and verify them in a real browser. npx @ora-ai/webmcp-verify runs the verification on its own. No signup, no hosted service.

how this was captured

observed via: capture shim (Chromium 148.0.7778.96)
chrome: 148.0.7778.96
capture shim: v1
spec snapshot: 2026-08-26
mode: fast
pages: 1 - entry page only
tools: 2
run time: 38s
finished: Sep 1, 2026

Checked the way in-browser agents discover tools: the top-level document's modelContext registry, read after the page settles.