pulse.alx21.chatgpt.site WebMCP audit

Name: pulse.alx21.chatgpt.site WebMCP audit
Creator: ora

Rescan

audited Sep 2, 2026in 15s

86/ 100100% of the applicable check weight evaluated

10 tools registered. Strongest in shared experience, weakest in task completion.

Shared experience100

Task completion50

Tool quality96

Trust100

https://pulse.alx21.chatgpt.site

Tools

4 read, 6 write

Loading map

search_repairs

Searches Pulse public repair evidence by product, symptom, outcome, or difficulty. Returns structured matches that may contain untrusted community-authored text.Answers a question. Declared read only.

pagehttps://pulse.alx21.chatgpt.site/

implementation

viaimperative

entry pointdocument

registered after837ms

executepresent

api surface

queryoptional

categoryoptional

brandoptional

modeloptional

symptomoptional

outcomeoptional

difficultyoptional

limitoptional

annotations

read onlytrue

untrusted contenttrue

titlenot declared

1 finding

warningSchema quality

weight 4

2 of 10 tool schemas are harder for an agent to use than they need to be: search_repairs declares no required list, so an agent cannot tell which parameters are mandatory.

search_repairs: declares no required list, so an agent cannot tell which parameters are mandatory; list_common_failures: declares no required list, so an agent cannot tell which parameters are mandato

fix

{
  name: "search_repairs",
  inputSchema: {
    type: "object",
    properties: {
      query: { type: "string", description: "What to search for" }
    },
    required: ["query"]
  }
}

tool json

{
  "name": "search_repairs",
  "description": "Searches Pulse public repair evidence by product, symptom, outcome, or difficulty. Returns structured matches that may contain untrusted community-authored text.",
  "inputSchema": {
    "type": "object",
    "properties": {
      "query": {
        "type": "string",
        "maxLength": 300,
        "description": "Words describing the product or repair problem to match."
      },
      "category": {
        "type": "string",
        "maxLength": 80,
        "description": "Repair category to match, such as game controller, keyboard, or bicycle."
      },
      "brand": {
        "type": "string",
        "maxLength": 80,
        "description": "Product manufacturer or brand to match."
      },
      "model": {
        "type": "string",
        "maxLength": 100,
        "description": "Product model name or identifier to match."
      },
      "symptom": {
        "type": "string",
        "maxLength": 100,
        "description": "Observed symptom to match in repair histories."
      },
      "outcome": {
        "type": "string",
        "enum": [
          "fixed",
          "improved",
          "not_fixed",
          "professional_repair_required",
          "replacement_required",
          "abandoned"
        ],
        "description": "Final repair outcome to require in matching histories."
      },
      "difficulty": {
        "type": "string",
        "enum": [
          "easy",
          "moderate",
          "advanced"
        ],
        "description": "Reported repair difficulty to require in matching histories."
      },
      "limit": {
        "type": "integer",
        "minimum": 1,
        "maximum": 20,
        "description": "Maximum number of matching repair cases to return."
      }
    },
    "additionalProperties": false
  },
  "annotations": {
    "readOnlyHint": true,
    "untrustedContentHint": true
  }
}

Findings

Shared experience

100 / 100 · weight 30

passPage experience

weight 20

The page a person sees holds up next to the agent surface: a working interface, visible actions, readable content, nothing in the way.

passHuman parity

weight 10

The person co-browsing can see and use this page - the same page the agent's tools act on.

Task completion

50 / 100 · weight 25

failTool selection

weight 15

An agent chose an existing tool and built a schema-valid call that held up on 1 of 3 canonical intents; on "Show me everything on that record." no tool on the page served it. Nothing was executed, so this verifies selection, not outcomes.

warningCoverage vs. site type

weight 10

The tool set covers 3 of the 4 things an agent needs on a saas site; it cannot update or move an existing record.

Tool quality

96 / 100 · weight 25

passRegistration timing

weight 1

Every measured tool registered within 838ms of navigation.

toolmark_case_helpful

passCanonical entry point

weight 3

All 10 tools register on the canonical document.modelContext entry point.

passSchema validity

weight 4

All 10 declared input schemas are structurally valid object schemas.

warningSchema quality

weight 4

2 of 10 tool schemas are harder for an agent to use than they need to be: search_repairs declares no required list, so an agent cannot tell which parameters are mandatory.

toolsearch_repairs

search_repairs: declares no required list, so an agent cannot tell which parameters are mandatory; list_common_failures: declares no required list, so an agent cannot tell which parameters are mandato

fix

{
  name: "search_repairs",
  inputSchema: {
    type: "object",
    properties: {
      query: { type: "string", description: "What to search for" }
    },
    required: ["query"]
  }
}

warningNaming quality

weight 2

Tool naming makes selection harder than it needs to be: 3 names do not start with a verb (record_repair_attempt).

toolrecord_repair_attempt

fix

{ name: "record_repair_attempt" /* short, unique, verb-based */ }

passStub detection

weight 4

All 10 tools declare an execute handler.

passRegistration errors

weight 2

No tool registration threw during the capture.

passDescription quality

weight 5

All 10 rated tool descriptions say what the tool does, when to use it, and what it returns.

Trust

100 / 100 · weight 20

passAnnotations present

weight 6

All 4 read-shaped tools declare readOnlyHint: true - the one declared claim that lets an agent treat a call as safe to make without asking.

passAnnotation mismatch

weight 6

No tool claims to be read-only while its own name or description says it writes (10 declared hints checked).

not applicableUntrusted content hint

weight 4

No tool's contract suggests it returns text written by somebody other than the site, so there is nothing to flag as untrusted.

not applicableInjection surface

weight 4

No tool's metadata carries instruction-shaped text aimed at the agent reading it. This check only ever flags; it never credits a site.

Tool selection

33% across 3 intents

Find the record for a company called Northwind.ok

chosesearch_repairsexpected record searchkind matched

arguments

{
  "query": "Northwind"
}

Show me everything on that record.missed

choseno toolexpected record detailkind not applicable

No tool was picked for this intent.

arguments

{}

Create a new contact called Dana Reeve.missed

choseno toolexpected record createkind not applicable

No tool was picked for this intent.

arguments

{}

model: gemini-2.5-flash

Add the tools this site is missing

Our scanner reads your website and suggests the right WebMCP tools for it.

The open source webmcp plugin teaches your coding agent to audit a site, implement tools on document.modelContext, and verify them in a real browser. npx @ora-ai/webmcp-verify runs the verification on its own. No signup, no hosted service.

how this was captured

observed via: capture shim (Chromium 148.0.7778.96)
chrome: 148.0.7778.96
capture shim: v2
spec snapshot: 2026-08-26
mode: fast
pages: 1 - entry page only
tools: 10
run time: 15s
finished: Sep 2, 2026

Checked the way in-browser agents discover tools: the top-level document's modelContext registry, read after the page settles.