kujolang.ai WebMCP audit

Name: kujolang.ai WebMCP audit
Creator: ora

Rescan

audited Aug 31, 2026in 25s

87/ 100100% of the applicable check weight evaluated

4 tools registered. Strongest in shared experience, weakest in task completion.

Shared experience100

Task completion60

Tool quality88

Trust100

https://kujolang.ai

Tools

4 read, 0 write

Loading map

get_site_info

Describe this public static site,its navigation,and available content collections.Answers a question. Declared read only.

pagehttps://kujolang.ai/

implementation

viaimperative

entry pointdocument

registered after568ms

executepresent

api surfaceTakes no parameters.

annotations

read onlytrue

untrusted contenttrue

titlenot declared

0 findingsNo check named this tool.

tool json

{
  "name": "get_site_info",
  "description": "Describe this public static site,its navigation,and available content collections.",
  "inputSchema": {
    "type": "object",
    "additionalProperties": false,
    "properties": {}
  },
  "annotations": {
    "readOnlyHint": true,
    "untrustedContentHint": true
  }
}

Findings

Shared experience

100 / 100 · weight 30

passPage experience

weight 20

The page a person sees holds up next to the agent surface: a working interface, visible actions, readable content, nothing in the way.

passHuman parity

weight 10

The person co-browsing can see and use this page - the same page the agent's tools act on.

Task completion

60 / 100 · weight 25

warningTool selection

weight 15

An agent chose an existing tool and built a schema-valid call that held up on 2 of 3 canonical intents; on "Create a new contact called Dana Reeve." no tool on the page served it. Nothing was executed, so this verifies selection, not outcomes.

warningCoverage vs. site type

weight 10

The tool set covers 2 of the 4 things an agent needs on a saas site; it cannot create a record or start a job or update or move an existing record.

Tool quality

88 / 100 · weight 25

passRegistration timing

weight 1

Every measured tool registered within 569ms of navigation.

toolget_content

passCanonical entry point

weight 3

All 4 tools register on the canonical document.modelContext entry point.

passSchema validity

weight 4

All 4 declared input schemas are structurally valid object schemas.

warningSchema quality

weight 4

3 of 4 tool schemas are harder for an agent to use than they need to be: search_site 3 parameters have no description (query, limit, content_type).

toolsearch_site

search_site: 3 parameters have no description (query, limit, content_type); list_content: 3 parameters have no description (type, taxonomy, limit); get_content: 2 parameters have no description (id, u

fix

{
  name: "search_site",
  inputSchema: {
    type: "object",
    properties: {
      query: { type: "string", description: "What to search for" }
    },
    required: ["query"]
  }
}

passNaming quality

weight 2

All 4 tool names are consistent, verb-led, and within Chrome's size guidance.

passStub detection

weight 4

All 4 tools declare an execute handler.

passRegistration errors

weight 2

No tool registration threw during the capture.

passDescription quality

weight 5

All 4 rated tool descriptions say what the tool does, when to use it, and what it returns.

Trust

100 / 100 · weight 20

passAnnotations present

weight 6

All 4 read-shaped tools declare readOnlyHint: true - the one declared claim that lets an agent treat a call as safe to make without asking.

passAnnotation mismatch

weight 6

No tool claims to be read-only while its own name or description says it writes (4 declared hints checked).

not applicableUntrusted content hint

weight 4

No tool's contract suggests it returns text written by somebody other than the site, so there is nothing to flag as untrusted.

not applicableInjection surface

weight 4

No tool's metadata carries instruction-shaped text aimed at the agent reading it. This check only ever flags; it never credits a site.

Tool selection

67% across 3 intents

Find the record for a company called Northwind.ok

chosesearch_siteexpected record searchkind matched

arguments

{
  "query": "Northwind",
  "content_type": "company"
}

Show me everything on that record.ok

choseget_contentexpected record detailkind matched

arguments

{
  "id": ""
}

Create a new contact called Dana Reeve.missed

choseno toolexpected record createkind not applicable

No tool was picked for this intent.

arguments

{}

model: gemini-2.5-flash

Add the tools this site is missing

Our scanner reads your website and suggests the right WebMCP tools for it.

The open source webmcp plugin teaches your coding agent to audit a site, implement tools on document.modelContext, and verify them in a real browser. npx @ora-ai/webmcp-verify runs the verification on its own. No signup, no hosted service.

how this was captured

observed via: capture shim (Chromium 148.0.7778.96)
chrome: 148.0.7778.96
capture shim: v1
spec snapshot: 2026-08-26
mode: fast
pages: 1 - entry page only
tools: 4
run time: 25s
finished: Aug 31, 2026

Checked the way in-browser agents discover tools: the top-level document's modelContext registry, read after the page settles.