betteroff.finance WebMCP audit

Name: betteroff.finance WebMCP audit
Creator: ora

Rescan

audited Nov 6, 2026in 12s

100/ 100100% of the applicable check weight evaluated

4 tools registered. Every measured layer scored 100.

Shared experience100

Tool selection100

Tool quality100

Trust100

https://betteroff.finance

Tools

3 read, 0 write, 1 undeclared

Loading map

search_betteroff_content

Search published BetterOff guides, calculators, coverage, product and legal pages by title and description. Use it to find a page, then read or open the returned canonical path. Results include review dates.Answers a question. Declared read only.

pagehttps://betteroff.finance/

implementation

viaimperative

entry pointdocument

registered after985ms

executepresent

api surface

queryrequired

limitoptional

annotations

read onlytrue

untrusted contentnot declared

titleSearch BetterOff content

0 findingsNo check named this tool.

tool json

{
  "name": "search_betteroff_content",
  "description": "Search published BetterOff guides, calculators, coverage, product and legal pages by title and description. Use it to find a page, then read or open the returned canonical path. Results include review dates.",
  "inputSchema": {
    "type": "object",
    "properties": {
      "query": {
        "type": "string",
        "minLength": 1,
        "maxLength": 100,
        "description": "Words from the user's request, such as high yield savings."
      },
      "limit": {
        "type": "integer",
        "minimum": 1,
        "maximum": 20,
        "description": "Most results to return. Defaults to 10."
      }
    },
    "additionalProperties": false,
    "required": [
      "query"
    ]
  },
  "annotations": {
    "readOnlyHint": true
  }
}

Findings

Shared experience

100 / 100 · weight 30

not applicableVisible effect

weight 6

Not invoked on this run: this audit did not call any tool. Scheduled re-audits only read the registry; a live audit from the report page calls the tools that declare readOnlyHint: true and not consequentialHint: true.

passPage experience

weight 16

The page a person sees holds up next to the agent surface: a working interface, visible actions, readable content, nothing in the way.

passHuman parity

weight 8

The person co-browsing can see and use this page - the same page the agent's tools act on.

Tool selection

100 / 100 · weight 25

not applicableInvoke success rate

weight 6

passTool selection

weight 12

An agent chose an existing, callable tool and built a schema-valid call for all 3 canonical intents, each matching the kind of tool its intent needs. Nothing was executed, so this verifies selection, not outcomes.

not applicableCoverage vs. site type

weight 7

This tool set does not place the site in a category with a known expected tool shape, so there is no coverage baseline to score it against.

Tool quality

100 / 100 · weight 25

passRegistration timing

weight 1

Every measured tool registered within 987ms of navigation.

toolnavigate_to_betteroff_page

passCanonical entry point

weight 3

All 4 tools register on the canonical document.modelContext entry point.

passSchema validity

weight 4

All 4 declared input schemas are structurally valid object schemas.

passSchema quality

weight 4

All 4 tool schemas describe their parameters, and every description stays within Chrome's size guidance.

passNaming quality

weight 2

All 4 tool names are consistent, verb-led, and within Chrome's size guidance.

passStub detection

weight 4

All 4 tools declare an execute handler.

passRegistration errors

weight 2

No tool registration threw during the capture.

passDescription quality

weight 5

All 4 rated tool descriptions say what the tool does, when to use it, and what it returns.

Trust

100 / 100 · weight 20

passAnnotations present

weight 4

All 3 read-shaped tools declare readOnlyHint: true - the one declared claim that lets an agent treat a call as safe to make without asking.

passAnnotation mismatch

weight 4

No tool claims to be read-only while its own name or description says it writes (3 declared hints checked).

not applicableUntrusted content hint

weight 3

No tool's contract suggests it returns text written by somebody other than the site, so there is nothing to flag as untrusted.

not applicableConsequential hint

weight 3

No tool name reads like a consequential action (a purchase, a booking, a payment, a transfer, a deletion), so there is no consequentialHint to expect.

not applicableHint vs. observed

weight 3

not applicableInjection surface

weight 3

No tool's metadata carries instruction-shaped text aimed at the agent reading it. This check only ever flags; it never credits a site.

Tool selection

100% across 3 intents

I want to search betteroff content on this site.ok

chosesearch_betteroff_contentexpected search betteroff contentkind matched

arguments

{
  "query": "content"
}

I want to read betteroff page on this site.ok

choseread_betteroff_pageexpected read betteroff pagekind matched

arguments

{
  "offset": 0
}

I want to lookup betteroff glossary on this site.ok

choselookup_betteroff_glossaryexpected lookup betteroff glossarykind matched

arguments

{
  "query": "glossary"
}

model: gemini-2.5-flash

Add the tools this site is missing

Our scanner reads your website and suggests the right WebMCP tools for it.

The open source webmcp plugin teaches your coding agent to audit a site, implement tools on document.modelContext, and verify them in a real browser. npx @ora-ai/webmcp-verify runs the verification on its own. No signup, no hosted service.

how this was captured

observed via: native modelContext
chrome: 151.0.7922.34
capture shim: v3
spec snapshot: 2026-11-04
mode: fast
pages: 1 - entry page only
tools: 4
invoked: not invoked; a live audit calls them
run time: 12s
finished: Nov 6, 2026

Checked the way in-browser agents discover tools: the top-level document's modelContext registry, read after the page settles.

Listed in the community directory.